← Back to introduction

weighted h-index

Similar to the R-index, the weighted h-index (Egghe and Rousseau 2008) is designed to give more weight to publications within the core as they gain citations. The primary difference is that for this metric the core is defined differently. Publications are still ranked by citation count, but instead of using the raw rank, one uses a weighted rank of

$$r_w\left(i\right)=\frac{\sum\limits_{j=1}^{i}{C_j}}{h},$$

that is, the weighted rank of the ith publication is the cumulative sum of citations for the top i publications, divided by the standard h-index. With these weighted ranks, one finds the last publication in the weighted core, r0, as the largest value of i where \(r_w\left(i\right)\leq C_i\) (the last publication for which the weighted rank of that publication is less than or equal to the number of citations for that publication):

$$r_0=\underset{i}{\max}\left(r_w\left(i\right)\leq C_i\right).$$

The weighted index is then calculated as$$h_w=\sqrt{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{r_0}{C_i}},$$the square-root of the sum of citations for the weighted core.

Example

Publications are ordered by number of citations, from highest to lowest.

Citations (Ci)472619151110432111100000
Rank (i)123456789101112131415161718
h = 6
Cumulative Citations (ΣCi)477392107118128132135137138139140141141141141141141
rw(i) = ΣCi / h7.8312.1715.3317.8319.6721.3322.0022.5022.8323.0023.1723.3323.5023.5023.5023.5023.5023.50
r0 = 3

The largest rank where rw(i) ≤ Ci is 3. The weighted h-index is the square-root of the sum of citations up to this rank, thus hw = √92 = 9.5917

History

Yearhw
19971.0000
19982.4495
19995.7446
20006.8557
20019.5917
200212.9228
200316.3707
200421.2603
200526.2488
200631.3369
200735.6931
200839.3192
200944.7325
201049.7695
201153.9722
201258.9067
201363.8749
201467.8528
201572.5879
201676.3348
201779.4040
201883.4805
201985.1058
202088.9326
202191.5806
202294.2550
202396.4106
202496.7419

References