← Back to introduction

impact vitality

Impact Vitality (Rons and Amez 2008, 2009) is similar in concept to the trend h-index, but more complicated to measure. If cx is the total number of citations (across all publications) from year x, and w is the number of years back from the present (year Y) one wishes to calculate the metric for (the citation window), then

$$IV\left(w\right)=\frac{w\left(\frac{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{w}{\frac{c^{Y-w}}{i}}}{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{w}{c^{Y-w}}} \right)-1 }{\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^{w}{\frac{1}{i} } \right)-1}.$$

The numerator of the numerator is the sum of citation counts divided by their age for the window of time in question; the denominator of the numerator is the total number of citations for the same window of time. An impact vitality score of 1 indicates that the number of citations is approximately constant over time. A value above 1 indicates that the number of citations is increasing through time, while a value below 1 indicates the number of citations is decreasing through time. Individuals with very different total numbers of citations can have identical scores because the metric is focused on proportional change and not absolute numbers. However, even beyond the issues of more difficult data collection, this metric has odd properties because of its overwhelming focus on immediacy. It would produce a higher score for someone with just 1 citation a year ago and no citations 2 years ago than another person with 1,000 citations 2 years ago and no citations one year ago.

History

YearIV
1997n/a
1998n/a
1999n/a
2000n/a
20011.7550
20021.7469
20031.6014
20041.6599
20051.5422
20061.4805
20071.3314
20081.1967
20091.1318
20101.1548
20111.2047
20121.1526
20131.1268
20141.0332
20151.0023
20161.0037
20170.9518
20180.9694
20190.9705
20200.9878
20211.0503
20221.0338
20230.9678
20240.9697
20250.5949