← Back to introduction

impact vitality

Impact Vitality (Rons and Amez 2008, 2009) is similar in concept to the trend h-index, but more complicated to measure. If cx is the total number of citations (across all publications) from year x, and w is the number of years back from the present (year Y) one wishes to calculate the metric for (the citation window), then

$$IV\left(w\right)=\frac{w\left(\frac{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{w}{\frac{c^{Y-w}}{i}}}{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{w}{c^{Y-w}}} \right)-1 }{\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^{w}{\frac{1}{i} } \right)-1}.$$

The numerator of the numerator is the sum of citation counts divided by their age for the window of time in question; the denominator of the numerator is the total number of citations for the same window of time. An impact vitality score of 1 indicates that the number of citations is approximately constant over time. A value above 1 indicates that the number of citations is increasing through time, while a value below 1 indicates the number of citations is decreasing through time. Individuals with very different total numbers of citations can have identical scores because the metric is focused on proportional change and not absolute numbers. However, even beyond the issues of more difficult data collection, this metric has odd properties because of its overwhelming focus on immediacy. It would produce a higher score for someone with just 1 citation a year ago and no citations 2 years ago than another person with 1,000 citations 2 years ago and no citations one year ago.

History

YearIV
1997n/a
1998n/a
1999n/a
2000n/a
20011.7550
20021.7469
20031.6053
20041.6518
20051.5368
20061.4813
20071.3403
20081.1985
20091.1323
20101.1563
20111.2018
20121.1521
20131.1263
20141.0336
20151.0049
20161.0011
20170.9497
20180.9721
20190.9701
20200.9890
20211.0470
20221.0320
20230.9677
20240.9422